On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 20:25+0100, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 12:57-0500, Michael Butler wrote:
>
> > This member removal has other consequences. As follows ..
> >
> > --- lib/libprocstat__L ---
> > Building /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/lib/libprocstat/smbfs.o
> > --- libprocstat.o ---
> > /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:620:29: error: no member named
> > 'next' in 'struct vm_map_entry'
> > for (entryp = map->header.next;
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
> > /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:622:24: error: no member named
> > 'next' in 'struct vm_map_entry'
> > entryp = vmentry.next) {
> > ~~~~~~~ ^
> > 2 errors generated.
>
> Now we seem to be missing the prototypes:
>
> --- libprocstat.o ---
> /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:620:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'vm_map_entry_first' is invalid in C99
> [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> for (entryp = vm_map_entry_first(map);
> ^
> /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:620:15: error: incompatible
> integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'vm_map_entry_t' (aka
> 'struct vm_map_entry *') from 'int' [-Werror,-Wint-conversion]
> for (entryp = vm_map_entry_first(map);
> ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:622:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'vm_map_entry_succ' is invalid in C99
> [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> entryp = vm_map_entry_succ(&vmentry)) {
> ^
> /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:622:16: note: did you mean 'vm_map_entry_first'?
> /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:620:17: note: 'vm_map_entry_first' declared here
>
> I'm at r355504.
Now at r355506, and my laptop is building the kernels, one at a time.
--
Trond.