Glen Barber gjb at
Sat May 7 07:49:26 UTC 2016

On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 09:46:03AM +0200, Ben Woods wrote:
> On 7 May 2016 at 09:41, Glen Barber <gjb at> wrote:
> > I think this raises a larger question - did "something" change that
> > otherwise violates POLA?  The commit recently was intended to revert
> > a POLA violation, so maybe I am not entirely clear on what branch this
> > affects.
> >
> > Are we talking about head or stable/10 here?
> >
> > Glen
> >
> I am talking about head, which no longer installs/packages multiple kernels
> by default.
> Whilst the r299088 commit is referring to a stable POLA violation, the
> commit itself is a change to head with a proposed MFC after 3 days. Its
> interesting, because this has surprised me when testing PkgBase on head, as
> the behaviour has changed from the initial announcement.

I think there is a communication breakdown somewhere, then.

But, I also realize we are talking about two different commits.  (Which
is why I CC'd glebius@ in the previous reply.)

Since ngie@ already chimed in, I'll defer unless required to chime in.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list