r288951: ifconfig -alias, arp not removed
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery at FreeBSD.org
Thu Oct 29 16:46:38 UTC 2015
On 10/29/15 9:42 AM, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> On 10/29/2015 11:25, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> # ifconfig
>> igb0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
>>
>> options=403bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,VLAN_HWTSO>
>> ether c8:0a:a9:04:39:78
>> inet 10.10.0.7 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 10.10.255.255
>> inet 10.10.7.2 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 10.10.255.255
>> inet 10.10.0.9 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 10.10.255.255
>> nd6 options=23<PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
>> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
>> status: active
>>
>> # ifconfig igb0 inet 10.10.0.9 -alias
>> # arp -an|grep 10.10.0.9
>> ? (10.10.0.9) at c8:0a:a9:04:39:78 on igb0 permanent [ethernet]
>> # arp -d 10.10.0.9
>> arp: writing to routing socket: Operation not permitted
>>
>> I swear this is not normal. I'm on an older build as well, r288951.
>
> That definitely looks abnormal. See what "route get" says. I think
> that's the error you get when there is a route for that address.
>
# netstat -rn|grep 10.10.0.9
# route get 10.10.0.9
route to: lapbox
destination: 10.10.0.0
mask: 255.255.0.0
fib: 0
interface: igb0
flags: <UP,DONE,PINNED>
recvpipe sendpipe ssthresh rtt,msec mtu weight expire
0 0 0 0 1500 1 0
# route get 5.5.5.5
route to: 5.5.5.5
destination: default
mask: default
gateway: router.asus.com
fib: 0
interface: igb0
flags: <UP,GATEWAY,DONE,STATIC>
recvpipe sendpipe ssthresh rtt,msec mtu weight expire
0 0 0 0 1500 1 0
For more context, this current system had 10.10.0.9 added to it. I
started up a VM which also started using 10.10.0.9 and managed to "win"
on the local network for owning it. (I don't know arp and this stuff
well). I then came to this system to remove the alias and the arp entry
to allow me to connect from it and have gotten into this situation.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list