[RFC] Removin the old make

Baptiste Daroussin bapt at freebsd.org
Fri Feb 13 08:46:11 UTC 2015


On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 05:47:27PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 01:24 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:49:13AM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure for tha=
> > > > t I
> > > > want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove the old =
> > > .................................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > make
> > > > =66rom base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th.
> > > > 
> > > > Note that bmake is the default since FreeBSD 10.
> > > > FreeBSD 9.3 is also providing bmake (as bmake) on default installation.
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Bapt
> > > 
> > > I don't know the difference, but it seems potentialy dangerous to
> > > remove old make without notice ?
> > > 
> > Old make was already removed in 10.x what remains is only the sources and that
> > is what I propose to remove from 11 (and only from 11)
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Bapt
> 
> fmake exists as a port too, doesn't it?  That's what I vaguely remember
> as the plan... bmake available in 9, it's the default in 10 but fmake
> source is still around, and then in 11 fmake is gone from base but
> available as a port.
> 
Yes it is in port for sure.
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20150213/2663459a/attachment.sig>


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list