Kernel panic with fresh current, probably nfs related
Joel Dahl
joel at vnode.se
Tue Aug 25 19:10:12 UTC 2015
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:18:00AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
>
> On 08/23/15 18:36, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
> > Index: sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c
> > ===================================================================
> >
> >
> - --- sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c (revision 287087)
> > +++ sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c (working copy) @@ -3044,7 +3044,7 @@
> > em_setup_interface(device_t dev, struct adapter *a
> > if_setioctlfn(ifp, em_ioctl); if_setgetcounterfn(ifp,
> > em_get_counter); /* TSO parameters */ - ifp->if_hw_tsomax =
> > EM_TSO_SIZE; + ifp->if_hw_tsomax = IP_MAXPACKET;
> > ifp->if_hw_tsomaxsegcount = EM_MAX_SCATTER;
> > ifp->if_hw_tsomaxsegsize = EM_TSO_SEG_SIZE;
>
>
> Seems to work. However, I cannot reproduce the user panic in the first
> place. What's the scenario that seems to work here? NFS seems happy
> with/without the patch so I'm not confident in anything we are doing her
> e.
I see several patches here. Which one should I be using?
--
Joel
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list