Voxer using FreeBSD, BSDNow.tv interview

Nikolai Lifanov lifanov at mail.lifanov.com
Mon Oct 20 18:49:36 UTC 2014


On 10/20/14 14:43, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 02:33:20PM -0400, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
>> On 10/20/14 13:36, Rainer Duffner wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am 20.10.2014 um 10:19 schrieb David Chisnall <theraven at FreeBSD.org>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I presume that most of the relevant differences are for users / developers and not sysadmins?  It's worth noting that GNU coreutils, tar, bash, and a load of other things are in the ports repository.  I wonder if it's worth having a gnu-userland metaport, perhaps with something like the Solaris approach of sticking them all in a different tree so that you can just add that to the start of your PATH and have all of the GNU tools work by default.  
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> They use chef.
>>> The chef omnibus installer assumes there is a /bin/bash. Even the FreeBSD version of it. Well, it least it did the last time I looked. Maybe this got fixed in the meantime.
>>> Which means that to „bootstrap“ a node, you’ve first got to install pkg on it, install bash, symlink it to /bin/bash and then bootstrap the node.
>>> Which kind of runs against the concept of doing everything via chef.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hi from sysutils/ansible maintainer!
>>
>> The ansible port REINPLACE_CMDs away hardcoded paths at build time. This
>> way managing FreeBSD "just works". Maybe chef can benefit from the same
>> approach?
>>
> USES=shebangfix is there exactly for that.
> 

I USES=shebangfix, but it only fixes ~40% of path problems (although in
a very neat and easy to use way). Hardcoded etcdir, module directory,
man pages, etc. also need to be changed.

> regards,
> Bapt
> 



More information about the freebsd-current mailing list