10.0-BETA1 ZFS install -- /var/empty read-only
Eric van Gyzen
eric at vangyzen.net
Wed Oct 23 13:38:15 UTC 2013
On 10/23/2013 08:30, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Eric van Gyzen <eric at vangyzen.net> wrote:
>>> I just installed 10.0-BETA1 using the [very cool] new automatic ZFS
>>> option. I noticed that /var/empty is not mounted read-only. I suspect
>>> it could be. I made it so, and sshd still seemed to work.
>>>
>>> Eric
>> I don't think there's a standard for how to break down the ZFS pool to
>> individual datasets. If the install made only a single dataset for
>> /var you would then effectively get a read-write /var/empty. The
> *The same applies*
>
>> applies if you install on UFS and don't assign a separate filesystem
>> for /var/empty like the default install does in fact.
There might not be a standard, but the installer does have a default
set, which includes a separate filesystem for /var/empty. I imagine
this was done specifically to make it read-only. Since that was not
done, it seems like an oversight.
Eric
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list