rcs

[Julian Elischer]

On 10/9/13 4:38 AM, Graham Todd wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> I think that's great. But, as we are increasingly finding, theres 
>> no stable
>> ports snapshot, so unless we as a project change how packages are 
>> managed,
>> there may not really be a stable, predictable version of things once
>> they're moved from base to a package. A number of users and 
>> companies like
>> that there is a very strict definition of base and that it wont 
>> change as
>> the ports tree changes.
>>
>> Eg, you install 10.0 and get the rcs package from that. You then do an
>> install of 10.0 a yeat later and install rcs. If it comes from the
>> 10-stable pkgng set, itll pick up the latest version, not the 10.0 
>> version.
>> Thats the big ports vs base difference.
>
> Perhaps a perl style "dual life module" set of "core" (errm BASE?) 
> packages/ports will emerge. It could resolve some of the perennial 
> "what is BASE"? debates - or at least make it possible to have those 
> debates in a different way :-)
>
> My understanding is that dealing with the GPLv3 issue for BASE is 
> *necessary* for the project. Since the latest rcs releases are 
> licensed using GPLv3, FreeBSD's BASE rcs (GPLv2) would have to be 
> maintained exclusively by the FreeBSD project - which means more 
> developer overhead (the same could be said for gcc I suppose). That 
> seems to be a different type of issue than the size/completeness of 
> BASE itself.

but RCS is not GPLv3 and what we have works fine... just leave it alone!

>
> Since rcs is a small utility, it's hooked into a script or two via 
> rc.subr, it's useful to a lot of folks, it doesn't face the network 
> and there's a BSD licensed equivalent sort of available, then maybe 
> the best way to go would be to import opencvs's rcs (which is not 
> part in the ports version of opencvs) to replace the GNU version.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>