rcs is gone?

[Adrian Chadd]

Hi!

Then you and others should stand up and provide feedback like this far, far
earlier in the development process.

If everyone who communicates says "x" and no-one says anything about the
other letters "a"->"w", "y", "z", then we as developers don't really have a
good cross-section of what people actually need.

If you truely are doing things that require this level of service(s), then
I encourage you to contact the FreeBSD Foundation and communicate exactly
what your requirements are and why. They'll be able to steer things.

Thanks!


-adrian



On 7 October 2013 16:00, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon at orthanc.ca> wrote:

>
> On 2013-10-07, at 3:45 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon at orthanc.ca> wrote:
>
> > Having RCS in the base system is very useful.  We use it to track
> changes to bits of /etc on the machines where we don't do wholesale
> customizations.  (Those ones get git, but they also get an install of
> /usr/ports with a fully populated /usr/ports/distfiles.)
>
> To clarify, the git-enabled machines are a small isolated subset of the
> development machines.  Then comes the test and q/a environment, where we
> (by contract) roll nothing beyond the base OS and our application software.
>
> There are other development shops dealing with the same restrictions.
>  Most of them have to stay quiet about these requirements on account of the
> Homeland Security.  They are all getting buggered over by the fallacy that
> everyone has a gigabit ethernet connection permanently wired into their ass
> ...
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>