WEAK_REFERENCE?

[Konstantin Belousov]

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:00:55PM +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> I prepared two patches, see below. The amd64 one is reviewed by bde@ and
> the i386 is compile tested by me (runtime is theoretically also done,
> but I'm not sure since I do not have 32-bit apps on my amd64).
Use cc -m32.

> 
> The amd64 is compile and runtime tested. The tools, nm, shows that we
> have the weak_references as before.
> 
> If you agree I'd like to commit both within a few days to -CURRENT. If
> someone steps up and confirms that the i386 part also runs, would be
> great, but I expect it to work.
> 
> If I'm correct, there is some similar work to be done on arm, mips and
> sparc64, I'm happy to do this if the people like to have it done. But I
> do not own either of them to test in native config. Except sparc64.....
> Here I have blech ;)
> 
> 
> Here the two patches
> amd64:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~andreast/weak_ref_amd64.diff
> i386:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~andreast/weak_ref_i386.diff

Amd64 patch is fine. For i386, I do not see a definition of the
WEAK_REFERENCE in the patch, and quick search of the pre-existing
definition in sys/i386 or lib/libc/i386 does not reveal anything.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20131119/06780be0/attachment.sig>