Any objections/comments on axing out old ATA stack?

[Aleksandr Rybalko]

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:43:07 -0700
Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org> wrote:

> My main concern with the new stuff is that it requires CAM and that's
> reasonably big compared to the standalone ATA code.
> 
> It'd be nice if we could slim down the CAM stack a bit first; it makes
> embedding it on the smaller devices really freaking painful.

/me never seen embedded devices with ATA/SATA and less than 64MB of RAM.
(i386/i486 old machines does not count :) )
I'm missing something?

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> 
> adrian
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"


-- 
Aleksandr Rybalko <ray at ddteam.net>