7+ days of dogfood
erichsfreebsdlist at alogt.com
Mon Feb 11 11:40:12 UTC 2013
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:48:11 +0100
Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen at fabiankeil.de> wrote:
> Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> > My conclusion: on at least my not-so-new laptop, FreeBSD-10 can
> > be used in a desktop environment if one takes some care during the
> > installation.
> I'm using CURRENT on my also-no-so-new laptop since FreeBSD 7
> (I think) and came to the same conclusion.
I did this during 6.x time but got stuck then with 6.x and never went
back until last May/June.
> It's unfortunate that the builworld time roughly trippled since
> 2010 but I guess that's progress and a more powerful system
> should fix it. I certainly welcome clang in general, though.
Trippled? Are you sure? I have the feeling it is much worse than this.
Was it in 2009 when I could compile world in a few minutes on my quad
core. The same machine takes now hours despite having more memory.
I run currently my desktop and my notebook on 10. If I stick with my
policy, I would stay with 10 until 12 would be available.
On the other side, it feels so outdated not to have something like
the most current version.
More information about the freebsd-current