GCC withdraw

[Slawa Olhovchenkov]

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 06:30:24AM -0400, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:

> > If the 150 ports that only work with gcc, all work with a ports
> 
> > > gcc and do not need the gcc from base, would the following be OK ?
> > >
> > > - 9.x gcc default and clang in base;
> > > - 10.x clang default and gcc in ports;
> >
> > Well, we write rules and we brake them. ;-)
> >
> > Just say that we know we brake them but it's inevitable because...
> > And go futher.
> >
> 
> I am not a developer, just a user, so I am not versed in all of the
> issues but I
> would REALLY like to see gcc moved to ports for 10.x
> 
> In my opinion this just needs to happen, if ports break, we deal with that
> on  a case by case basis.

Oh, I remember. mplayer on i386 can't be builded witch clang -- clang
don't understand inlined asm.