sysutils/lsof Author Question (for CLANG)....
Greg 'groggy' Lehey
grog at FreeBSD.org
Thu Nov 8 22:41:15 UTC 2012
[Text formatting recovered]
On Thursday, 8 November 2012 at 9:23:11 -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2012-11-08 09:20, Edward Tomasz Napiera??a wrote:
>> Wiadomo???? napisana przez Andriy Gapon w dniu 8 lis 2012, o godz. 15:17:
>>> Just curious why lsof can't use interfaces that e.g.
>>> fstat/sockstat/etc use? Those base utilities do not seem to
>>> experience as much trouble as lsof.
>> Note that fstat(8) does not report file paths. On the other hand,
>> procstat(8) does. It looks like "procstat -fa" and "procstat -va"
>> together provide the same information lsof(8) does; unfortunately
>> there doesn't seem to be a way to show a "merged" output for files
>> opened (-f) and files mmapped, but closed (-v).
Hmm. I don't know the details, but potentially there *would* be a
more kosher way of doing what lsof wants.
> Remember also that lsof is portable between MANY flavors of *nix.
Only because the author goes to a lot of effort to make it so.
There's special-case code for most kernels. In the case of FreeBSD,
it would make sense to use documented interfaces where possible, and
create them where they don't exist.
Sent from my desktop computer.
Finger grog at FreeBSD.org for PGP public key.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft MUA reports
problems, please read http://tinyurl.com/broken-mua
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the freebsd-current