DragonFly vs FreeBSD scheduler

O. Hartmann ohartman at zedat.fu-berlin.de
Sat Nov 3 15:37:01 UTC 2012

Am 11/03/12 15:17, schrieb Mark Felder:
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 21:18:55 +0800
> Alie Tan <alie at affle.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> No offence, just curious about scheduler and its functionality.
>> What is the different between this two that makes FreeBSD performance far
>> behind DragonFly BSD? http://www.dragonflybsd.org/release32/
> I don't have any details but I do know that Dragonfly has been putting a lot of work into their scheduler. Hopefully some of that will trickle back our way.

Obviously they made the right decissions, but a single benchmark with a
DB server like postgresql doesn't tell the whole story. Let's see what
Phoronix will come up with. I'd like to see some more benchmarks of
DragonFly 3.2.

I doubt that the DragonFly scheduler approaches will go/flow easily into
FreeBSD. But I'd like to see it, even dumping ULE for a better approach.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20121103/4c0e456c/attachment.sig>

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list