UFS+J panics on HEAD
linimon at lonesome.com
Wed May 23 22:05:42 UTC 2012
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:58:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> While it might be a shame to see FFS go by the wayside are there any
> big reasons why you would rather stick with FFS instead of moving
> to ZFS with all the benefits that brings?
- ZFS eats bytes for breakfast. It is completely inappropriate
for anything with less than 4GB RAM.
- ZFS performs poorly under disk-nearly-full conditions.
More information about the freebsd-current