SU+J and fsck problem ?

[jb]

Hi,

FB9.0-RELEASE; no updates or recompilation.
 
In multi-user mode:
$ mount
/dev/ada0s2a on / (ufs, local, journaled soft-updates)
The fs was in normal state (no known problem, clean shutdown),

Booted by choice in single-user mode.

# mount
/dev/ada0s2a on / (ufs, local, read-only)
 
# fsck -F
** /dev/ada0s2a

USE JOURNAL? [yn] y

** SU+J recovering /dev/ada0s2a
** Reading 33554432 byte journal from inode 4.

RECOVER? [yn] y

** ...
** Processing journal entries.

WRITE CHANGES? [yn] y

** 208 journal records in 13312 bytes for 50% utilization
** Freed 0 inodes (0 dirs) 6 blocks, and 0 frags.

***** FILE SYSTEM MARKED CLEAN ****

# fsck -F
** /dev/ada0s2a

USE JOURNAL? [yn] n

** Skipping journal, falling through to full fsck

** Last Mounted on /
** Root file system
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=114700 (8 should be 0) 
CORRECT? [yn] n

INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=196081 (32 should be 8) 
CORRECT? [yn] n

INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=474381 (32 should be 8) 
CORRECT? [yn] n

** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
FREE BLOCK COUNTS(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK
SALVAGE? [yn] n

SUMMARY INFORMATION BAD
SALVAGE? [yn] n

BLK(S) MISSING IN BIT MAPS
SALVAGE? [yn] n

266075 files, 939314 used, 1896628 free (2724 frags, 236738 blocks, 0.1%
fragmentation)

***** FILE SYSTEM MARKED DIRTY *****

***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****

***** PLEASE RERUN FSCK *****

# fsck -F
** /dev/ada0s2a

USE JOURNAL? [yn] y

** SU+J recovering /dev/ada0s2a
Journal timestamp does not match fs mount time
** Skipping journal, falling through to full fsck 

** Last Mounted on /
** Root file system
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=114700 (8 should be 0) 
CORRECT? [yn] y

INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=196081 (32 should be 8) 
CORRECT? [yn] y

INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=474381 (32 should be 8) 
CORRECT? [yn] y

** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
FREE BLOCK COUNTS(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK
SALVAGE? [yn] y

SUMMARY INFORMATION BAD
SALVAGE? [yn] y

BLK(S) MISSING IN BIT MAPS
SALVAGE? [yn] y

266075 files, 939314 used, 1896629 free (2725 frags, 236738 blocks, 0.1%
fragmentation)

***** FILE SYSTEM MARKED CLEAN *****

***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****

#

Summary:
1. # fsck -F          ## recovery done with J

2. # fsck -F          ## no recovery; fs marked dirty; time stamp modified
     Why during this step there were incorrect block counts reported if the fs
     was recovered and marked clean in step 1 ?
     Despite the fact that choice of no recovery was made, the fs was marked
     dirty (based on false assumption above ?, and time stamp ?)

3. # fsck -F          ## forced skipped Journal
     Same question as in step 2,
     based on which it accepted the choice of recovery ...
     Note:
     after step 2:
       1896628 free and 2724 frags in
       266075 files, 939314 used, 1896620 free (2724 frags, 236738 blocks, ...
     after step 3:
       1896629 free and 2725 frags in
       266075 files, 939314 used, 1896629 free (2725 frags, 236738 blocks, ...

Questions:
- is the fsck working properly with SU+J fs ?
  Note:
  fsck(8)
    -F ...
    -B ...
       It is recommended that you perform foreground fsck on your systems
       periodically and whenever you encounter file-system-related panics.
- would the fs as after step 1, and steps 1-3 or 1,3 be considered
  "recovered":
  - structurally ?
  - identical ?, does it matter ?
  - integrally ?

Any comments before I file a PR# ?
jb