FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports
kostikbel at gmail.com
Fri Jan 13 14:18:36 UTC 2012
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:11:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following:
> > Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this
> > affects ports/misc/compat8x/
> Looks like all the previous hints have not been clear enough.
> There is no direct relation between COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and misc/compat8x.
> COMPAT_FREEBSD<X> options are only needed when going from release X to release X+1
> there was a change to an existing system call at the kernel-userland boundary.
> A side note: kernel options affect only what's in the kernel, quite obviously.
> misc/compat<X>x contains versions of shared libraries from release X that are no
> longer present in X+1.
Additional twist is that not every change at the kernel/usermode boundary
is covered with backward-compatibility shims. Recent example is the CAM
ABI change, which makes libcam.so.5 from the compat8x useless.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20120113/7fb3a7e1/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-current