stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
lacombar at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 20:58:03 UTC 2012
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Freddie Cash <fjwcash at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Chris Rees <utisoft at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ok, I'm a stupid lazy user (obviously)... While browsing the ftp, I
>>> see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory. Do you expect me to consult
>>> freebsd-announce@, verify the signature of the announce, the hash of
>>> the ISOs, etc. to consider that 9.0 has been released ? No, I see 9.0
>>> ISOs in a `releases' directory, I assume it has been released,
>>> whatever your spreading process is.
>>> Btw, none of the CHECKSUMS files are signed on the FTP.
>> Have you checked the website? The latest supported release is clearly
>> specified, right in the middle of the home page.
>> Please don't tell me you'd look in ftp before checking the website. I
>> think you're just looking to nitpick.
> And, which is worse:
> 1. tag the release branch, build the ISOs, upload to main FTP
> server, wait for the mirrors (FTP, CVS, SVN) to sync, then make the
> official announcement which includes a few days/weeks where "the
> release" is available but not official; or
> 2. tag the release branch, build the ISOs, upload to main FTP
> server, make the official announcement, user goes to their
> favourite/closest mirror, and can't access the release since it hasn't
> synced yet
3. tag the release, build the ISOs, upload then to main FTP and
mirrors but restrict visibility, announce the release, make the
build visible everywhere.
At worse, fall-back on #2 with peer-to-peer distribution.
If some steps in that process do not exist, create them.
> I think people would complain a hell of a lot more about 2 than they
> currently do about 1.
> Yes, people upgrading via source will see X.Y-RELEASE before it's
> officially announced on the website/mailing lists. Yes, people
> browsing ftp.freebsd.org will see X.Y-RELEASE ISOs before it's
> officially announced. Yes, some users will get confused by seeing
> X.Y-RELEASE available before the official annoucements.
> But, that's a lot better than making an annoucement and having users
> unable to use it since it's not available on their local mirrors.
> What's annoying, though, is that we have to go through this with every
> ... single ... minor ... release. It's not a hard concept, yet every
> time there's a new release, people get confused by it.
> Is there something that could be done to make it more
> streamlined/smoother? Maybe, maybe not. Depends. You'd have to want
> to join the RE team to find out more about the current release/mirror
> infrastructure. :) And then be willing to put in the time/effort to
> improve it. :D
> Does all of Arnaud's complaining and nit-picking constitute a request
> to volunteer to "fix" things? ;)
> Freddie Cash
> fjwcash at gmail.com
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-current