Time to bump default VM_SWZONE_SIZE_MAX?

[Dag-Erling Smørgrav]

John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> writes:
> Hmm, this is not true on i386 where the problem is not just the physical
> RAM required, but also address space.  (The swap zone is all mapped into KVA 
> even if it isn't used.)  This is why Alan's e-mail specifically
> mentioned amd64, ia64, etc. but not i386 in his list.  I think i386 still
> needs this limit, and I think your commit jumped the gun a bit.

How about we reinstate the limit on i386, but increase it to 64 MB?
That would increase the theoretical maximum to ~15 GB.  People with 8 GB
swap would get a warning, but would be unlikely to run into trouble.

(or we could increase the limit to 72351744 bytes, which is the precise
amount required to support 16 GB)

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no