10.0-CUR r226986 && ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp

Matthias Apitz guru at unixarea.de
Fri Nov 4 03:25:26 UTC 2011

El día Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 01:42:50PM -0400, b. f. escribió:

> No, it is not the same.  You can either masquerade, by setting UNAME_r
> and OSVERSION, or by editing the headers and scripts that define them;
> or you can use WITH_FBSD10_FIX for ports that define HAS_CONFIGURE
> (which is implied by USE_AUTOTOOLS and GNU_CONFIGURE).  Right now the
> masquerading is probably safer, because there are some problems with
> the fix that are still being resolved -- and a few ports that may fail
> despite the fix.  But of course if you help to test without
> masquerading, these problems will be resolved sooner.

Well, I will try to help.

I have set WITH_FBSD10_FIX in /etc/make.conf; the port
ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp installs:



/* define the system type include file here */
#define NETSNMP_SYSTEM_INCLUDE_FILE "net-snmp/system/freebsd10.h"

but the named header file is not there:

# ls -C1 /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/free*

I don't know what the correct fix ist, and for the moment I
created 'freebsd10.h' as a copy of 'freebsd9.h':

# cat freebsd10.h
#include "freebsd9.h"
#define freebsd8 freebsd8

+Cc: maintainer


Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e <guru at unixarea.de> - w http://www.unixarea.de/
UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370)
UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5

More information about the freebsd-current mailing list