[TESTING]: one more boot2 shrinking patch
Roman Divacky
rdivacky at freebsd.org
Thu Mar 10 16:37:36 UTC 2011
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:20:58AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 6:24:36 pm Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 2011-03-09 14:23, John Baldwin wrote:
> > >> gcc nor clang emits any code to initialize static type foo = 0;
> > >> because it's expected that BSS is zeroed, which is not the case
> > >> in boot2 so we have to initialize that explicitly
> > > It used to be that if you explicitly initialized a variable to 0, it was
> > > initialized to 0 in .data, but now gcc and clang recognize it is set to 0 and
> > > move it to .bss. There appears to be no way to turn this feature off,
> >
> > Yes, there is; both gcc and clang have this option to turn it off:
> >
> > -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss
> > If the target supports a BSS section, GCC by default puts variables
> > that are initialized to zero into BSS. This can save space in the
> > resulting code.
> >
> > This option turns off this behavior because some programs
> > explicitly rely on variables going to the data section. E.g., so
> > that the resulting executable can find the beginning of that
> > section and/or make assumptions based on that.
> >
> > The default is -fzero-initialized-in-bss.
>
> Hah, that is better then. Thanks! I should have searched about this more
> myself. :( Roman, can you try reverting the kname changes and adding this
> to CFLAGS instead for both compilers?
when I put -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss clang does not fit by 1.7K and
gcc by 0.5K, we dont want this :)
roman
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list