Thoughts on TMPFS no longer
being considered "highly experimental"
Sean M. Collins
sean at coreitpro.com
Fri Jul 1 15:33:47 UTC 2011
On 7/1/11 2:42 AM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> The box shouldn't wedge in this situation. If tmpfs can create
> a memory starvation situation on the kernel level, it is not
production ready.
The full message was "swap zone exhausted, increase kern.maxswzone" - I
guess that actual swap wasn't exhausted, but just space for metadata. So
in tmpfs' defense, AMD64 boots with a kern.maxswzone of 32MB like i386,
which only allows ~7 GB of swap to be allocated.
I'll see if I can get the machine to wedge again, then increase
kern.maxswzone, and repeat.
--
Sean Collins
Core IT Pro, LLC
www.coreitpro.com
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list