More if_ath churn coming your way!
fluffy at fluffy.khv.ru
Sat Jan 22 12:39:58 UTC 2011
22.01.2011, 22:19, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd at gmail.com>:
> So it's all completely stable for you too right now?
Yes, almost 7 hours with new kernel and no errors.
Stable as all previous revisions.
Wait a 802.11n support to utilize it with my home and office hotspots :)
> 2011/1/22 Dima Panov <fluffy at fluffy.khv.ru>;:
>> 22.01.2011, 13:56, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd at gmail.com>;:
>>> On 20 January 2011 13:51, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd at gmail.com>;; wrote:
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>> I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the
>>>> if_ath code into -HEAD.
>>> Ok, so I lied - the ANI changes were slightly intrusive. But all in
>>> all the code was just shuffled around a bit.
>>> Someone's reported that the AR9285 was once stable but now isn't. I'd
>>> really appreciate it if others who are using AR9280/AR9285 chipsets
>>> would test this out and get back to me.
>> FreeBSD 9.0-900030-CURRENT #0 r217695M: Sat Jan 22 13:57:57 VLAT 2011
>> ath0: <Atheros 9285> mem 0xf0000000-0xf000ffff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci9
>> ath0: AR9285 mac 192.2 RF5133 phy 14.0
>> Signal strength is fine, no packets loss.
>> ath 9285 was stable for me last months.
>> Acer Ferrari One 200 laptop with half-sized atheros wifi card.
>>> I'd like to make sure I fix all regressions before I start bringing
>>> over more code from ath9k in preparation for enabling the basic
>>> 802.11n support for testing.
Dima Panov (fluffy at FreeBSD.org)
KDE at FreeBSD team
More information about the freebsd-current