http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html

[Hartmann, O.]

On 08/31/11 20:13, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Hartmann, O.
> <ohartman at zedat.fu-berlin.de>  wrote:
>>    On 08/31/11 19:48, Chris Brennan wrote:
>>
>> On 8/31/2011 1:43 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
>> [1]<mihamina at rktmb.org>  wrote:
>>
>> On 08/30/2011 08:30 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>
>> I would be scared
>> away by such an arrogant looking page!
>>
>> So, refactoring this page is a must.
>> 1°) Put it offline? (i.e with a "At work" placeholder)
>> 2°) Process a feature list on one table column, leaving N columns emtpy for
>> N other OS, waiting for skills to contribute?
>>
>>     Yes and yes. I would start out with the FreeBSD highlights first
>> and foremost, then we can move on to compare it (in a positive light)
>> to other contemporary OSes.
>>
>> It should be noted on the FreeBSD side of the comparison, whom has
>> borrowed concepts from FreeBSD, such as the network stack or Gentoo's
>> Portage system (just to name a few that come to mind.)
>>
>>
>>    Oh yes ... and maybe those, who incorporated silently BSD stuff like
>>    the TCP/IP stack - like M$.
> The list would be way too long. I know other Linux-based groups that
> have integrated drivers from FreeBSD as well for proprietary work.
> Thanks,
> -Garrett
And claimed then it's GPLv3?