Hans Petter Selasky
hselasky at c2i.net
Tue Aug 30 07:32:30 UTC 2011
On Monday 29 August 2011 21:58:29 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> 27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> > This website should be brushed up or taken offline!
> > It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
> > http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
> I think this one would better look like list of major features with os
> comparison, like:
> = Networking =
> * IPv6: major support, best stack around.
> * SCTP: full kernel implementation, still no userland support (i.e.
> ssh doesn't work over sctp by default yet).
> = Data storage =
> * ZFS: full support, datasets, compression, dedup, other stuff. Linux
> has LVM (?features...) and btrfs (?unstable.. ?features..), Windows has
> dynamic disks since XP (?features).
> = SMP =
> * (?something about comparing other shedulers with SCHED_ULE), (?some
> rt stuff), (?some comparison with other interesting shedulers, like
> DragonflyBSD and QNX).
And USB. I believe there are significant changes in the USB subsystems which
those who are making performance benchmarks completely fail to mention.
More information about the freebsd-current