Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental"

[b. f.]

Peter Holm wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:57:16PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 06:20:03PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote:
> > > Got a "panic: Not a vnode object" quite fast:
> > >
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/log/kostik441.txt
> >
> > Ah, yes, this is an assertion that was added in the r209702.
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/tmpfs.7.patch
>
> Looks good. The mmap(2) test doesn't panic any more, nor does any of
> the other TMPFS tests I have.

Is this patch under consideration for inclusion in 9.0?

b.