clangBSD build error
Roman Divacky
rdivacky at freebsd.org
Sat May 22 10:28:56 UTC 2010
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 10:26:57AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 07:34:22PM -0700, ambrosehuang ambrose wrote:
> > 2010/5/21 Roman Divacky <rdivacky at freebsd.org>
> >
> > > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:10:23PM +0800, ambrosehuang ambrose wrote:
> > > > I found my clang version is :
> > > > [root at lateaxfreebsd src]# clang --version
> > > > clang version 2.0 (trunk)
> > > > Target: *x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.0*
> > > > Thread model: posix
> > > > svn revision is r10379_1 in PORTS
> > > >
> > > > I think maybe you can use the llvm-devel in PORTS to reproduce this
> > > >
> > > > I try to update clang to the latest version with
> > > > make BOOTSTRAP=1 _CKSUMFILES="", but it seems the patch file confilcts
> > > with
> > > > latest code?
> > > >
> > > > Could you tell me how to bypass the patching step ?
> > >
> > > there's no point in upgrading to newer clang. there were no change
> > > in this.. are you sure you are compiling with llvm-devel the malloc.c
> > > in clangbsd? not some older/newer version?
> > >
> >
> >
> > I'm sure the llvm-devel is version r10379 in freebsd-stable branch. I also
> > found that the
> > both clang from llvm-devel and clang built from clangBSD building
> > /usr/src.svn/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c(/usr/src.svn/src
> > is the clangBSD directory in my box) failed
> > with same error.
> >
> > maybe the version of clang in llvm-devel is too low, but the clang in
> > clangBSD itself should be OK
>
> pes ~/clangbsd$ md5 lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c
> MD5 (lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c) = 312d85c5cf51aa3fa1ef46c0832f0056
>
> can you compare to your malloc.c ? and if it differs can you send me
> your malloc.c ?
I just tried with llvm-devel port and malloc.c from clangbsd and it works
just ok.
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list