RFC: etcupdate tool in base?
dougb at FreeBSD.org
Thu Jun 10 20:25:56 UTC 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 06/10/10 11:18, Julian Elischer wrote:
| It does bring up the question (yet again) if we shouldn't
| have something that is between base and ports..
| the keep base from bloating too much bit to still indicate
| that they are supported.
This statement perpetuates the idea that somehow anything in ports is
"lesser" than things that are in src, which frankly I'm way past being
sick of. The ports tree is part of FreeBSD, period. If you don't believe
me, try installing just the base without installing any ports, and then
see how much work you're able to get done.
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the freebsd-current