BSDCan Toolchain Summit Summary
sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Tue Jun 1 17:10:21 UTC 2010
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:23:32AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:15:26AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> > Brooks Davis <brooks at freebsd.org> writes:
> > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/201005ToolchainSummitSummary
> > "No new functionality that requires clang/llvm."
> > How about "No new functionality with non-trivial incompatibilities with
> > clang/llvm"?
> That too. I'll add it to the real roadmap page once I create it.
> As long as people are willing to avoid the darker areas of gcc
> misfeatures that shouldn't be a problem in general, but I agree stating
> it as a target is a good idea.
You might add a first step to fix FreeBSD's libelf
incompatibilities with other libelf implementations.
More information about the freebsd-current