[HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head

Alexander Leidinger Alexander at Leidinger.net
Sun Jul 18 12:22:32 UTC 2010


On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:51:34 +0200 Marco van Lienen
<marco+freebsd-current at lordsith.net> wrote:


> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:25:56PM +0200, you (Stefan Bethke) sent
> the following to the -current list:
> > Am 17.07.2010 um 12:14 schrieb Marco van Lienen:
> > 
> > > # zpool list pool1
> > > NAME    SIZE   USED  AVAIL    CAP  HEALTH  ALTROOT
> > > pool1  5.44T   147K  5.44T     0%  ONLINE  -
> > ...
> > > zfs list however only shows:
> > > # zfs list pool1
> > > NAME    USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT
> > > pool1  91.9K  3.56T  28.0K  /pool1
> > > 
> > > I just lost the space of an entire hdd!
> > 
> > zpool always shows the raw capacity (without redundancy), zfs the
> > actual available capacity.
> 
> I have read many things about those differences, but why then does
> zfs on opensolaris report more available space whereas FreeBSD does
> not? That would imply that my friend running osol build 117 couldn't
> fill up his raidz pool past the 3.56T.

If you compare the yfs list output of OSol and FreeBSD and they differ
where they shouldn't, you should have a look if compression and/or
deduplication (were available) is activated.

Bye,
Alexander.


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list