[HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head
Alexander at Leidinger.net
Sun Jul 18 12:22:32 UTC 2010
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:51:34 +0200 Marco van Lienen
<marco+freebsd-current at lordsith.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:25:56PM +0200, you (Stefan Bethke) sent
> the following to the -current list:
> > Am 17.07.2010 um 12:14 schrieb Marco van Lienen:
> > > # zpool list pool1
> > > NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT
> > > pool1 5.44T 147K 5.44T 0% ONLINE -
> > ...
> > > zfs list however only shows:
> > > # zfs list pool1
> > > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
> > > pool1 91.9K 3.56T 28.0K /pool1
> > >
> > > I just lost the space of an entire hdd!
> > zpool always shows the raw capacity (without redundancy), zfs the
> > actual available capacity.
> I have read many things about those differences, but why then does
> zfs on opensolaris report more available space whereas FreeBSD does
> not? That would imply that my friend running osol build 117 couldn't
> fill up his raidz pool past the 3.56T.
If you compare the yfs list output of OSol and FreeBSD and they differ
where they shouldn't, you should have a look if compression and/or
deduplication (were available) is activated.
More information about the freebsd-current