fusefs-kmod broken?

Anish Mistry mistry.7 at osu.edu
Fri Aug 27 06:12:41 UTC 2010


On Monday 23 August 2010 10:57:40 Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > So, in this case is the fusefs module broken?  I'm guessing it is.
> > I don't like the way fuse_fileops is initialised in fuse4bsd.  I
> > would prefer for the struct to be zeroed and then the fo_xxx
> > implimented bits set as appropriate.  That way when the struct is
> > changed, you don't get stung again.
> 
> I am an idiot - that will have no effect.  This patch needs to be
> included in sysutils/fusefs-kmod/files

Would you file a PR with the patch accounting for the correct 
__FreeBSD_version__?

Thanks,

-- 
Anish Mistry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20100827/933b799e/attachment.pgp


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list