fusefs-kmod broken?
Anish Mistry
mistry.7 at osu.edu
Fri Aug 27 06:12:41 UTC 2010
On Monday 23 August 2010 10:57:40 Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > So, in this case is the fusefs module broken? I'm guessing it is.
> > I don't like the way fuse_fileops is initialised in fuse4bsd. I
> > would prefer for the struct to be zeroed and then the fo_xxx
> > implimented bits set as appropriate. That way when the struct is
> > changed, you don't get stung again.
>
> I am an idiot - that will have no effect. This patch needs to be
> included in sysutils/fusefs-kmod/files
Would you file a PR with the patch accounting for the correct
__FreeBSD_version__?
Thanks,
--
Anish Mistry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20100827/933b799e/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list