HEADS UP: SUJ Going in to head today

pluknet pluknet at gmail.com
Tue Apr 27 09:57:11 UTC 2010


On 27 April 2010 10:01, Jeff Roberson <jroberson at jroberson.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, pluknet wrote:
>
>> On 26 April 2010 17:42, dikshie <dikshie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jeff,
>>> thanks for SUJ.
>>> btw, why there is nan% utilization? and what does it mean?
>>> --------------
>>> ** SU+J Recovering /dev/ad0s1g
>>> ** Reading 33554432 byte journal from inode 4.
>>> ** Building recovery table.
>>> ** Resolving unreferenced inode list.
>>> ** Processing journal entries.
>>> ** 0 journal records in 0 bytes for nan% utilization <====
>>> ** Freed 0 inodes (0 dirs) 0 blocks, and 0 frags.
>>> --------------
>>>
>>
>> That may be due to an empty journal (the only plausible version for me),
>> so jrecs and jblocks are not updated.
>
> Yes, this is it exactly.  It's a simple bug, I will post a fix in the next
> few days.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>

While here, could you please look at my another su+j issue email?
(to not create a new thread of the same thing).
Thanks in advance.

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2010-April/023303.html

-- 
wbr,
pluknet


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list