libusb and fast current changes

[Andrew Thompson]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 05:51:51PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:39:11 +0000 Bruce Cran wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:29:21 +0300
> > Boris Samorodov <bsam at ipt.ru> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:39:15 +0000 Bruce Cran wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Lots of changes were made a couple of days ago to the
> > > > installation of libusb[20]: libusb20 is now installed as libusb, and
> > > > libusb20_compat01.h was renamed to usb.h to be compatible with
> > > > libusb-0.1.  So for example any patches which change <usb.h> to
> > > > <libusb20_compat01.h> can be removed.
> > > 
> > > Wow! Bruce, that was a nice shot. You definitely undertand what's
> > > going on here. Thanks!
> > > 
> > > Pav, can you test the attached patch? It work for the latest
> > > i386/amd64 CURRENT for me.
> 
> > You may find you're repeating work that's already been done:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/graphics/libgphoto2/ shows
> > libgphoto2 was updated a few days ago to fix the build problems
> > introduced with the renaming. 
> 
> It's the last version that doesn't work here. Please, take a look at
> the patch at my previous email and you'll understand that I
> implemented just what you said: "any patches which change <usb.h> to
> <libusb20_compat01.h> can be removed". ;-)
> 
> I think that an extra-patch for OSVERSION>800069 was introduced by an
> accident.

Yes, it should be removed.

Andrew