Benchmark [Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take
4]
Scott Long
scottl at samsco.org
Sat Jun 6 06:44:34 UTC 2009
Maho NAKATA wrote:
> I did a benchmark with Virtualbox:
>
> My environment:
> * Core 2 Quad, Q6600 at 3GHz
> * Windows XP SP3 at host SP2 at VBOX with GuestAddon
> * http://crystalmark.info/software/CrystalMark/
> CrystalMark 2004R3
> * Sapphire X1650
> * VBOX is running on FBSD7.2-REL/amd64
> using http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/vbox/virtualbox_5.tgz
> * Running with fullscreen mode 1280x1024 32bit
> Here is the result
> -----------------------------------------
> host(4CPU) host(1CPU) vbox(1CPU)
> Mark 173047 90925 86496
> ALU 50985 13493 13060
> FPU 63746 15126 15323
> MEM 21822 25582 16516
> HDD 9336 9331 30600(*)
> GDI 15153 15195 5127
> D2D 5997 5998 5108
> OGL 6200 6200 762
> -----------------------------------------
> (*)somehow lot faster
>
> I don't know how to use two CPUs, even changing setting
> doesn't change.
>
> Usually I cannot usually launch VirtualBox even by root.
> A workaround is that invoking and killing VirtualBox
> many times for me. After some tries I can launch...
>
> thanks
>
I take it that you're running freebsd on the "bare metal" in your 4CPU
and 1CPU tests, and running WinXP on the bare metal in the vbox test?
If so, are you using ATA disks and the ATA driver for all instances
of FreeBSD? If so, then the lack of NCQ in the FreeBSD ATA driver would
explain the HDD test result. I see similar results with VMWare.
Scott
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list