ZFS pool corrupted on upgrade of -current (probably sata renaming)

[James R. Van Artsdalen]

Freddie Cash wrote:
> That way, it doesn't matter where the physical devices are located
> in the system, nor what the physical device nodes are called, as zpool just
> looks for the label, and GEOM handles all the heavy lifting/translating for
> you.
>   

FreeBSD would probably be better off doing away with the ZFS cache
entirely.  That's what Apple did in the same situation (device names
that can change boot to boot).