Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standardcompiler?)

[Christoph Mallon]

Roman Divacky schrieb:
> 2) llvm uses special "bytecode" that gets compiled into native machine
> code so technically speaking "classic" assembler is not needed for llvm/clang.

This is an irrelevant detail for normal use.

> the chain with clang is: clang -> llvm bc -> native binary

This is just a kludge, because clang has no proper compiler driver, yet.