Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it
become standard compiler?)
Dimitry Andric
dimitry at andric.com
Thu Jan 15 02:17:00 PST 2009
On 2009-01-15 09:45, Roman Divacky wrote:
> I really dont see any reason why there must be only ONE compiler that
> can be used to compile FreeBSD.
I completely agree. When I said earlier in this thread "dependence on
GNU gcc has always been bad", I did NOT mean to say that gcc is bad in
itself, just the dependence on any particular C/C++ compiler.
This is also why it is worthwile to go for C89 or C99 standards
compliance. The less exotic (read: gcc-specific) extensions, the
better.
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list