still trouble with pci.c on i386
bf1783 at googlemail.com
Mon Dec 28 17:38:02 UTC 2009
I think John is referring to my first reply to Anton, early in the
thread, in which I said that I thought it would be easier for Anton to
get help for problems with -CURRENT by using svn revision numbers,
because most base system developers were using that VCS. Apparently,
John at least is not using svn exclusively, and is willing to look up
cvs revision numbers.
On 12/28/09, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des at des.no> wrote:
> John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> writes:
>> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des at des.no> writes:
>> > This discussion is pointless if your source tree is not a Subversion
>> > working copy.
>> That's not true. I still use cvsweb quite often as one can more easily
>> what has been MFC'd that way rather than with the svn equivalent. And it
>> easy to use cvsweb to find a particular CVS revision and map it to an SVN
> The discussion was about using Subversion to woll back commits in what
> was in all probability either a cvsup checkout or a CVS working copy.
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no
More information about the freebsd-current