Interface auto-cloning bug or feature?

Maksim Yevmenkin maksim.yevmenkin at gmail.com
Tue Sep 23 01:49:16 UTC 2008


[...]

>>> ok, how about attached patch. i put it together *very* quickly and
>>> only gave it a light testing. its for tap(4), because i could compile
>>> it as a module and tun(4) is compiled into kernel by default, but the
>>> idea should identical for tun(4). should be even simpler for tun(4)
>>> because it does not have to deal with 2 kind of devices (i.e. tap and
>>> vmnet). give it a try, and see if it works. please try both cloning
>>> paths, i.e.
>>>
>>> 1) cat /dev/tap (/dev/vmnet) with and/or without unit number
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> 2) ifconfig tapX (vmnetX) create/destroy
>>>
>>> in the mean time i will prepare something similar for tun(4).
>>
>> attached is similar patch for tun(4). i only made sure it compiles :)
>> rebuilding kernel now...

attached is a slightly better patch for tap(4). the idea is to use
extra ALLOCATED flag that prevents the race Kostik pointed out. could
you please give it a try? any review comments are greatly appreciated.
if this is acceptable, i will prepare something similar for tun(4)

thanks,
max
-------------- next part --------------
--- if_tap.c.orig	2008-09-08 17:20:57.000000000 -0700
+++ if_tap.c	2008-09-22 18:36:16.000000000 -0700
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@
 static int		tapifioctl(struct ifnet *, u_long, caddr_t);
 static void		tapifinit(void *);
 
+static int		tap_clone_lookup(struct cdev **, u_short);
 static int		tap_clone_create(struct if_clone *, int, caddr_t);
 static void		tap_clone_destroy(struct ifnet *);
 static int		vmnet_clone_create(struct if_clone *, int, caddr_t);
@@ -176,6 +177,30 @@
 DEV_MODULE(if_tap, tapmodevent, NULL);
 
 static int
+tap_clone_lookup(struct cdev **dev, u_short extra)
+{
+	struct tap_softc *tp;
+
+	mtx_lock(&tapmtx);
+	SLIST_FOREACH(tp, &taphead, tap_next) {
+		mtx_lock(&tp->tap_mtx);
+
+		if ((tp->tap_flags & (TAP_OPEN|TAP_ALLOCATED|extra)) == extra) {
+			tp->tap_flags |= TAP_ALLOCATED;
+			*dev = tp->tap_dev;
+			mtx_unlock(&tp->tap_mtx);
+			mtx_unlock(&tapmtx);
+
+			return (1);
+		}
+		mtx_unlock(&tp->tap_mtx);
+	}
+	mtx_unlock(&tapmtx);
+
+	return (0);
+}
+
+static int
 tap_clone_create(struct if_clone *ifc, int unit, caddr_t params)
 {
 	struct cdev *dev;
@@ -288,7 +313,7 @@
 		mtx_lock(&tapmtx);
 		SLIST_FOREACH(tp, &taphead, tap_next) {
 			mtx_lock(&tp->tap_mtx);
-			if (tp->tap_flags & TAP_OPEN) {
+			if (tp->tap_flags & (TAP_OPEN|TAP_ALLOCATED)) {
 				mtx_unlock(&tp->tap_mtx);
 				mtx_unlock(&tapmtx);
 				return (EBUSY);
@@ -353,8 +378,18 @@
 
 	/* We're interested in only tap/vmnet devices. */
 	if (strcmp(name, TAP) == 0) {
+		if (tap_clone_lookup(dev, 0)) {
+			dev_ref(*dev);
+			return;
+		}
+
 		unit = -1;
 	} else if (strcmp(name, VMNET) == 0) {
+		if (tap_clone_lookup(dev, TAP_VMNET)) {
+			dev_ref(*dev);
+			return;
+		}
+
 		unit = -1;
 		extra = VMNET_DEV_MASK;
 	} else if (dev_stdclone(name, NULL, TAP, &unit) != 1) {
@@ -559,12 +594,11 @@
 	KNOTE_UNLOCKED(&tp->tap_rsel.si_note, 0);
 
 	mtx_lock(&tp->tap_mtx);
-	tp->tap_flags &= ~TAP_OPEN;
+	tp->tap_flags &= ~(TAP_OPEN|TAP_ALLOCATED);
 	tp->tap_pid = 0;
 	mtx_unlock(&tp->tap_mtx);
 
-	TAPDEBUG("%s is closed. minor = %#x\n", 
-		ifp->if_xname, minor(dev));
+	TAPDEBUG("%s is closed. minor = %#x\n", ifp->if_xname, minor(dev));
 
 	return (0);
 } /* tapclose */
--- if_tapvar.h.orig	2005-06-10 12:04:52.000000000 -0700
+++ if_tapvar.h	2008-09-22 17:34:00.000000000 -0700
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
 #define	TAP_ASYNC	(1 << 3)
 #define TAP_READY       (TAP_OPEN|TAP_INITED)
 #define	TAP_VMNET	(1 << 4)
+#define TAP_ALLOCATED	(1 << 5)
 
 	u_int8_t 	ether_addr[ETHER_ADDR_LEN]; /* ether addr of the remote side */
 


More information about the freebsd-current mailing list