URGENT: Need help rebuilding iir RAID5 array with failed drive
Søren Schmidt
sos at FreeBSD.ORG
Sun Jun 29 16:09:50 UTC 2008
On 29Jun, 2008, at 16:24 , Steven Hartland wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benjamin Close" <Benjamin.Close at clearchain.com
> >
>
>> Perhaps a lesson as developers we should take from this, is to put
>> a warning in ata about raid5. It's fooled Garret into believing he
>> had a raid5, how many others are also using ata believing their
>> raid5 is a raid5. We should warn people in the future rather than
>> just saying 'its in the docs'. A kernel warning at attach is much
>> more visible.
>
> Although it is more visible, personally I would prefer it to just fail
> instead of proceeding. RAID5 is not RAID5 without parity so why even
> allow it to continue and hence risk such an unrecoverable situation?
Well, this has been rehashed many times before, it has been disabled,
put a warning in the boot log, warning in the docs, all 3 was the
favorite at the time it was done.
I'm all ears for what the decision might be this time, just get
consensus and I'll flip the right switch.
-Søren
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list