Anyone else seeing this (cvs wierdness)?
yanefbsd at gmail.com
Fri Jun 6 17:34:31 UTC 2008
On Jun 6, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Peter Wemm wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:55 AM, David O'Brien <obrien at freebsd.org>
>> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 04:12:39PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
>>> Recently - I guess in the last month or two - successive cvs updates
>>> always "updates" files in the following directories, this with no
>>> update to the CVS repo:
>>> I sync a local CVS repo using cvsup and I update my source using
>>> 'cvs -q update -PdA'
>> Why are you always using "update -A"? Basically all the reports of
>> weirdness are due to folks not fully understanding what -A does and
>> If -A removes stickly dates, tags, and (what you're seeing here)
>> options. Options can be set locally, in the ,v file on the
>> server. Some
>> keywords (such as $Name$) may need to be updated due to "update -A".
> We use -A because we've often messed with sticky dates and tags in our
> checked out copy and want to reset anything we've forgotten and start
> from a known state. For the last 14 years, -A has done exactly that.
> If a stray sticky date or sticky tag had been set, -A would reset the
> tag and fetch a new copy and life was good.
> This is not what is happening now. If the server has a nonstandard
> rcs keyword expansion mode, cvs fetches a fresh copy, each and every
> time. Even if the checked out copy has the correct expansion mode.
> Over and over and over again.
> Many places in the source tree were affected by clowns using 'cvs
> import -ko' in spite of it being removed from the instructions in 1997
> and no longer being part of standard procedure. Ports is badly
> affected by -ko at this point.
+1 for that.
Besides, not using -A can prove to be problematic as Kris pointed out
to me when doing development and stuff isn't 100% synced between my
local copy and HEAD.
More information about the freebsd-current