Turning COMPAT_43TTY into a binary-only compatibility
Julian H. Stacey
jhs at berklix.org
Tue Jan 29 02:41:25 PST 2008
Ed Schouten wrote:
> Is there someone who wants to help me here?
I'm too busy to review or help what you'r up to, sorry, but if your
changes are the way FreeBSD is going, I have hardware that uses these:
/usr/ports/comms/gnokii MAINTAINER=mad at madpilot.net
/usr/ports/misc/estic Port by me, MAINTAINER=dinoex at FreeBSD.org
/usr/ports/sysutils/nut MAINTAINER=Joerg.Pulz at frm2.tum.de
& if necessary ? I'll be able to test diffs occasionaly when necessary.
(Hosts here run releasess & stable, but I could put up current when needed).
Loads of people presumably similarly rely on serial port coms to
various obscure Non PC hardware, Sometimes ports MAINTAINER= wont
have hardware to test with (eg in case of misc/estic I think).
Perhaps ports Makefiles might benefit from another variable with
email of hardware tester[s] ? (thus cc'd suggestion to
portsmaster at freebsd.org)
Julian Stacey. Munich Computer Consultant, BSD Unix C Linux. http://berklix.com
More information about the freebsd-current