panic: System call lstat returning with 1 locks held

[Mark Linimon]

On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 08:42:43AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> IMO if we're going to ship NTFS support in the base it should actually 
> function, or at minimum not panic the box.

This is a symptom of a general problem, "things that we doubt work very
well".  What's your suggestion on how we can flag these?

The traditional argument is that if we don't ship code in the base, it
will never get tested.  IMHO it would a big change to turn off everything
that isn't 100% solid.

I'm open to suggestions.

mcl