panic: System call lstat returning with 1 locks held
dougb at FreeBSD.org
Sat Jan 26 15:09:33 PST 2008
Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2008/1/26, Doug Barton <dougb at freebsd.org>:
>> Yar Tikhiy wrote:
>>> No doubt. :-) But the urgency of this problem appears much lower
>>> than that I estimated in the first place--fortunately. Broken UFS
>>> would be a nightmare.
>> IMO if we're going to ship NTFS support in the base it should actually
>> function, or at minimum not panic the box. As I reported earlier, I can
>> panic my -current system with 100% reliability with fairly light access
>> to an NTFS volume, which I consider to be a fairly large problem, at
>> least for my personal usage pattern.
> I'm not sure now, are you referring to some problems introduced by my
> patches or not?
Not sure of the timeline. I think this is the most relevant post on
the matter, let me know if there is anything I can do to help diagnose
This .signature sanitized for your protection
More information about the freebsd-current