RFC: Adding a hw.features sysctl
igor at hybrid-lab.co.uk
Mon Jan 14 01:26:40 PST 2008
On 14/01/2008, Nathan Lay <nslay at comcast.net> wrote:
> I have to agree with Daniel here. ioctl is probably inappropriate.
> sysctl is already intended for gathering or setting system information
> by both programs and/or people. cat'ing /dev/cpuinfo sounds reminiscent
> to Linux /proc.
> sysctl() could fill a cpu features bitmask for programs.
> sysctl dev.cpu.features (or something like that) could output those
> features in human readable format.
So how would you MIB these:
CPU: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 280 (2411.12-MHz K8-class CPU)
Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x20f12 Stepping = 2
Cores per package: 2
? Would you need four separate MIBs? Have four separate bitmasks in
one MIB, what order in? Is there XXX Features3, what would happen
More information about the freebsd-current