FreeBSD's problems as seen by the BSDForen.de community

[Mark Kirkwood]

Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
>
> Why because it was eventually proven incomplete by relatively?  (i.e.
> if no one dared question it then the incorrect version of the law
> would still be used today and odds are there would be no computers
> because electronics uses modern physics and not classical)
>
>   
The above analogy is invalid as FreeBSD is not an existing reality to be 
discovered, but a construct of the minds and efforts of its community. 
Therefore if the community is satisfied with the license as it is, there 
is no reason to change it.

Obviously I can't speak for the whole community, but speaking as one 
member I would be most unhappy to see stakeholders have influence based 
on monetary/commercial elements - the lack of such is one of the things 
I *like* about FreeBSD.

regards

Mark