When will ZFS become stable?
ivoras at freebsd.org
Sun Jan 6 09:36:42 PST 2008
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Ivan Voras wrote:
>> Robert Watson wrote:
>>> I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned this yet in the thread, but
>>> another thing worth taking into account in considering the stability
>>> of ZFS is whether or not Sun considers it a production feature in
>>> Solaris. Last I heard, it was still considered an experimental
>>> feature there as well.
>> Last I heard, rsync didn't crash Solaris on ZFS :)
> [Citation needed]
I can't provide citation about a thing that doesn't happen - you don't
hear things like "oh and yesterday I ran rsync on my Solaris with ZFS
and *it didn't crash*!" often.
But, with some grains of salt taken, consider this Google results:
* searching for "rsync crash solaris zfs": 790 results, most of them
* searching for "rsync crash freebsd zfs": 10,800 results; a small
number of the results is from this thread, some are duplicates, but it's
a large number in any case.
I feel that the number of Solaris+ZFS installations worldwide is larger
than that of FreeBSD+ZFS and they've had ZFS longer.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20080106/a7c1d56c/signature.pgp
More information about the freebsd-current