sbrk(2) broken
Dag-Erling Smørgrav
des at des.no
Fri Jan 4 01:33:02 PST 2008
Robert Watson <rwatson at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> The right answer is presumably to introduce a new LIMIT_SWAP, which
> limits the allocation of anonymous memory by processes, and size it to
> something like 90% of swap space by default.
Not a good solution on its own. You need a per-process limit as well,
otherwise a malloc() bomb will still cause other processes to fail
randomly.
> Since that won't be happening before 7.0, I believe the consensus is
> to simply not MFC the changes for 7 and proceed with the release.
Thank you :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list