Memory problem with latest malloc.c
Joe Marcus Clarke
marcus at FreeBSD.org
Wed Jan 2 22:15:45 PST 2008
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 22:12 -0800, Jason Evans wrote:
> Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 18:26 -0800, Jason Evans wrote:
> >> It would be really helpful to me if you run your program with
> >> MALLOC_OPTIONS=dM and monitor memory usage. These flags cause mmap to
> >> be used instead of sbrk, and we can find out from that how much memory
> >> you really need. If peak memory usage is substantially different when
> >> using mmap versus sbrk, there's probably a malloc bug.
> >
> > Memory climbed up to 976 MB SZ, 974 MB RSS MB with dM
> > -> /etc/malloc.conf. The file was eventually generated without error.
> > Again, with Aj -> /etc/malloc.conf, the python2.5 process operating on
> > the same file planed out at 504 MB SZ, 501 MB RSS.
>
> Okay, that indicates that there is not a problem with malloc; you're
> running into the data segment resource limit. It isn't possible to
> increase the data segment beyond 512 MB on i386, so your best bet is to
> use MALLOC_OPTIONS=DM for the memory-intensive program. That will cause
> the program use all available space in the data segment, then start
> using mmap as necessary.
Yeah, I just realized that after looking at the memory usage of rev
1.154 (it's the same). I could tweak kern.maxdsiz in loader.conf, but ~
1 GB is way too much memory for this program. I know what causes the
extra memory usage, so I think I'll bug the Evolution guys. Thanks.
>
> I'm sorta thinking that MALLOC_OPTIONS=DM should be the default. Robert
> Watson is the person who talked me into this change, so feel free to
> give him a hard time about the extra configuration you have to do in
> order to get work done. =)
It may not be obvious to all users and I think many will be bit by this
(i.e. POLA violation) considering maxdsiz is 512 MB on i386. Having DM
the default would be a good idea IMHO.
Joe
--
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome at FreeBSD.org
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20080103/9bc1dea7/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list